A letter from civil rights and media organizations to the Council of Europe and the European Court of Human Rights regarding its position on Turkey's crimes in Syria

Mrs. Marija Pejčivonić Burić, Secretary General of the Council of Europe, Mr. Robert Ragnar Spano, President of the European Court of Human Rights, Ladies and Gentlemen, Representatives of the Council of Europe and the European Court of Human Rights, Since the start of the Turkish military operations in the Kurdish-specific areas in northern Syria, the region has turned into a hotbed of all forms of human rights violations. After Turkey occupied those areas and tightened its control over them, it, along with its affiliated factions (the Syrian National Army, which is linked as a military body to the Syrian Coalition for Revolutionary and Opposition Forces), prevented displaced civilians from returning to their homes and practiced theft, looting, plundering, armed robbery, confiscating and burning property and crops, burning forests, forcibly kidnapping civilians and arbitrarily arresting them. It also practiced killing, torture, looting, destroying and stealing antiquities, as well as destroying and assaulting religious shrines, cemeteries and cultural symbols. It also suppressed freedoms, and worst of all, it embarked on practices of forcibly changing the demographic composition of the region in order to erase its Kurdish specificity and character. It has committed many other violations and crimes, most of which amount to war crimes, crimes against humanity, ethnic cleansing, and genocide. All or some of this is proven and confirmed by reports from governmental and non-governmental organizations such as Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the reports of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Syria.

A statement to public opinion in support of the culture of dialogue and rejection of hate speech

A statement to the public opinion in support of the culture of dialogue and rejecting the speech of June 10, 2020. We, representatives of civil society institutions, were surprised by the statement issued on June 7, 2020, by a group of representatives of institutions and individuals who reject the steps of Kurdish-Kurdish rapprochement. We affirm our steadfast humanitarian and moral position in support of all paths of dialogue and negotiation, in line with the Geneva process and Security Council Resolutions 2118 and 2254 in particular, and all UN resolutions issued regarding the resolution of the Syrian crisis. We affirm our support for any rapprochement or understanding between all Syrian national frameworks, or any transformation that adopts the language of dialogue as an alternative to the language of arms, leading to a comprehensive, sustainable, and appropriate political solution that repairs the effects of the long war, consolidates civil peace, and strengthens the bonds of coexistence. A solution that guarantees the dignity, rights, and freedoms of all components of Syrian society, without exception or exclusion. We also view this Kurdish-Kurdish dialogue positively, as a necessary and urgent contribution to the path of national dialogues leading to comprehensive solutions that satisfy all Syrians. Those who drafted this statement have tried to undermine national unity by spreading hostile rhetoric that incites hatred among the people of one country, prolonging the devastating war and further tearing apart the Syrian fabric, through the scarecrow of partition, which has become the most vulgar term for anyone who dares to market their dubious projects.